Patient-centered Contraceptive Counseling Research Articles

An Interactive Curriculum to Teach Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

Following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, it is increasingly important for all providers to be equipped to counsel on contraceptive options. Current curricula are insufficient for medical students to attain competency in contraceptive counseling. Quality contraceptive counseling requires patient-centered communication skills, which are also critical in many other clinical scenarios. Systematic teaching of patient-centered communication is lacking, both in contraceptive counseling and more broadly. We developed a person-centered contraceptive counseling curriculum containing a reference guide, 5- to 10-minute interactive online module, and 30-minute formative standardized patient session for clerkship-year medical students. Performance during formative sessions was evaluated using a checklist, with standardized patients and preceptors providing real-time feedback. We used surveys of knowledge, self-perceived skills, and attitudes about patient-centered counseling to compare students who did and did not receive the curriculum. Twenty-seven students received the new curriculum. The reference guide and online module were easily integrated into a clinical rotation without requiring additional time spent by educators. The formative session required more resources to implement but was valuable for students to solidify the communication skills in the new curriculum. Checklist results showed that students demonstrated many of the counseling skills taught in the module. Survey results about the impact of the new curriculum were promising but limited by the small sample size. The curriculum successfully introduced patient-centered contraceptive counseling skills and provided a valuable practice opportunity. Other sites could adapt components of this curriculum to enhance education in person-centered contraceptive counseling.

A 3-year Retrospective Review of Contraceptive Initiation, Continuation, Switching, and Pregnancy Among Adolescents and Young Adults

PurposeTo understand contraceptive use patterns (initiation, switching, discontinuation) as well as associations with pregnancy in adolescents and young adults attending a teen family planning clinic. MethodsWe performed a chart review of adolescent and young adult patients (ages 12–20) attending a teen family planning clinic in Atlanta, GA between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Using a standardized abstraction form with quality controls, we collected available data on contraceptive methods used and pregnancy test results during the 3-year period. We analyzed contraceptive use patterns descriptively. We calculated and compared pregnancy incidence according to different contraceptive switch patterns. ResultsOur sample included 2,798 individuals who initiated 2,358 prescribed methods. The most commonly prescribed methods of contraception were the contraceptive injection (28.3%), etonogestrel implant (23.5%) and combined hormonal pill (23.2%). There were 599 discontinuations of prescribed methods; side effects like bleeding and headache were the most cited reasons for discontinuation. Most (75.8%) initiated a moderately or highly effective method after discontinuing a moderately or highly effective method. The incidence rate of pregnancy was highest for those who had discontinued an intrauterine device or implant and started a shorter-acting contraceptive method. DiscussionEmploying patient-centered contraceptive counseling that incorporates contraceptive experiences in addition to facts and allows for exploration and change may be valuable for young people. Successful navigation of contraceptive switches may require additional attention, education, and strategy, which could include hypothetical problem solving, close follow-up, and telehealth or virtual care.

Association Between Facility and Clinician Characteristics and Family Planning Services Provided During U.S. Outpatient Care Visits.

Recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention emphasize the importance of access to comprehensive family planning services and recommend patient-centered contraceptive counseling be incorporated into routine primary care visits for reproductive-age individuals. This study aims to describe family planning service provision in outpatient care settings and assess differences by facility and clinician characteristics. Using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data, a nationally representative survey of outpatient care visits, we assessed family planning service provision by facility location, facility type, physician specialty, types of clinicians seen, and whether the patient was seen by their primary care provider. We used random intercept logistic regression with robust standard errors, adjusting for patient characteristics, and state and year fixed effects. The analytic sample included 53,489 patient visits with reproductive-age (15-49years) individuals between 2011 and 2019. Family planning services were provided at 8% of total sampled visits and were more likely to be provided in urban compared with rural areas (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; p=.02) and at community health centers compared with private physician practices (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; p=.00). Family planning services were also more likely to be provided when the patient saw a physician assistant or nurse compared with only a physician. After controlling for observed covariates, measures of between-clinician heterogeneity indicate wide variation in which clinicians provided family planning services. Family planning services were more likely to be provided in urban areas, at community health centers, and when patients received team-based care. The wide variation between clinicians suggests a need to better incorporate family planning services into primary care and other outpatient settings to meet patient needs and preferences.

Contraceptive counseling for adolescents in the emergency department: A novel curriculum for nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Many adolescents use the emergency department (ED) as their primary source of health care. As a result, the ED serves as a unique opportunity to reach adolescents. Although many adolescent visits to the ED are related to reproductive health, ED providers report barriers to providing this care, including lack of training. Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) serve a vital role in the provision of consistent care to adolescents in the ED. The purpose of this study was to create a curriculum to train NPs and PAs at two pediatric institutions to provide patient-centered contraceptive counseling to adolescents in the pediatric ED regardless of their chief complaint. To do this, we created a four-part webinar followed by an in-person training session. Participants completed training and then conducted counseling sessions with adolescents in the ED. Counseling sessions were recorded and reviewed for fidelity to delineated counseling principles, and data from post-counseling surveys were collected. 27 NPs and PAs completed the training and conducted 99 counseling sessions. Nearly all sessions incorporated essential content and communication principles such as shared decision making (90%) and teach-back methods (75%). All NPs and PAs who participated reported satisfaction and subjective improvement in knowledge and competence from the training. This curriculum offers a novel and feasible approach to train NPs and PAs to deliver patient-centered contraception counseling to adolescents in the ED setting, and it can serve as a model for how to educate different providers to incorporate reproductive health education into the busy ED visit.

Provider perspectives on a point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care among Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD

ObjectivesTo explore clinician perspectives on the development, utility, and feasibility of a provider-facing point-of-care tool to assist in provision of patient-centered contraceptive care for Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD. MethodsWe conducted 25 semi-structured qualitative interviews with a sample of clinicians who provide contraceptive care to Latina/x patients. An interview guide was developed based on prior research related to patient-centered care and extant point-of-care tools. Transcripts were independently coded by two study team members and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. ResultsFour themes emerged from the data: (1) clinician perception of a need for a tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care, (2) concern for tool burden and burnout, (3) desire for tool ease of use, and (4) a need for cultural awareness during tool development to avoid bias and typecasting. ConclusionsA provider-facing, point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive counseling was acceptable among providers, provided the tool is easy to use and promotes cultural awareness. InnovationIn the current era of more limited reproductive choice across the U.S., the need and support for non-coercive, patient-centered contraceptive care is timely. A provider-facing, point-of-care tool can facilitate the provision of patient-centered care among clinicians proving contraceptive counseling to Latina/s.

Contraceptive counseling and choices in pregnancies with maternal cardiac disease

Objective Unplanned pregnancies in women with maternal cardiac disease (MCD) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the majority of these individuals do not use highly reliable contraception on postpartum hospital discharge. Contraceptive counseling in this population outside of pregnancy is incomplete and counseling during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the provision and quality of contraceptive counseling for individuals with MCD during pregnancy. Methods All individuals with MCD who delivered between 2008 and 2021 at a tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team were sent a 27-question survey. A subset of questions were derived from the validated Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning (IQFP) survey, which emphasizes interpersonal connection, adequate information, and decision support for the individual. Each participant received a $15 gift card for survey completion. We performed chart review for clinical and demographic details, including cardiac risk score. Results Of 522 individuals to whom the survey was sent, 133 responded and met inclusion criteria. Overall, 67% discussed contraception with their general obstetrician, 36% with their maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist, and 24% with their cardiologist. Compared to individuals with low cardiac risk scores, those with high cardiac risk scores had a nonsignificant trend toward being more likely to discuss contraception with a MFM provider (52% vs 33%, p = .08). 65% reported that their provider was ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ in all IQFP domains. Respondents valued providers who respected their autonomy and offered thorough counseling. Respondents disliked feeling pressured or uninformed about the safety of contraceptive options. Conclusion Most individuals with MCD reported excellent contraceptive counseling during pregnancy. Additional work is needed to understand barriers to and enablers for effective, patient-centered contraceptive counseling and use in this population.

Negative Perceptions and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Choice in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) have high rates of safety, satisfaction, and continuation in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Despite this, utilization of these methods by AYAs is low. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative personal perceptions or beliefs about birth control and LARCs and their association with contraceptive use in AYAs. We surveyed young people (14-24 years old) seeking care at a Title X-supported adolescent reproductive and sexual health clinic to assess negative perceptions of birth control methods, with an emphasis on LARCs. We used appropriate bivariate statistics to compare those endorsing 3 or fewer negative perceptions with those who had more than 3 and logistic regression to identify predictors of contraceptive choice. We recruited 345 participants; 337 (97.7%) completed the survey. Among respondents, the median age was 20 (range 14-24) years, and 7.04% of participants had ever been pregnant. The most commonly held negative perceptions were fear of device migration or breakage causing adverse health effects and concern about effect on future fertility. The number of negative perceptions endorsed did not differ significantly by age. However, a greater number of negative perceptions and younger age were clinical predictors of LARC nonuse. AYAs have negative perceptions about LARCs that are often inaccurate and may limit contraceptive acceptability and perceived options. Engaged and respectful dialogue with AYAs about their concerns and fears is essential to provide accurate and patient-centered contraceptive counseling and to ensure that young people can make informed contraceptive choices.

Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure

ObjectiveA performance measure assessing how often patients experience patient-centered contraceptive counseling can inform quality improvement in contraceptive care and enable efforts to enhance equity in the provision of this care. We sought to test the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) measure as a performance measure, in preparation for application for endorsement from the National Quality Forum. Study designWe combined data from two research studies, a statewide quality improvement assessment, and a dedicated data collection effort at nine sites, all collected between 2009 and 2019 at 22 total sites in the United States, to evaluate the validity and reliability of the four-item PCCC measure aggregated at the provider and facility level. We scored the PCCC dichotomously as a "top-box" score of 20 versus less than 20. We assessed reliability using the Spearman-Brown coefficient, and validity by comparing scores on the PCCC to aggregated scores on single-item measures of patient satisfaction. ResultsWe included 22 facilities and 34 providers in the analyses. The average PCCC top-box score by provider and facility was 81% and 79%, respectively. We found adequate reliability with panel sizes of 20–50. PCCC scores were strongly associated with the single-item measures of satisfaction. There were notable disparities by race/ethnicity and language (Spanish vs English) in PCCC scores. DiscussionThe PCCC is a valid and reliable performance measure for use at the provider and facility level. The development and use of the measures of patient experience, like the PCCC, is critical for prioritizing patient-centeredness in reproductive health care. ImplicationsThe PCCC measure can facilitate the identification of gaps and disparities in patient-centered contraceptive counseling and enable quality improvement to promote quality, equitable contraceptive care. Using this measure provides the opportunity to enhance patient experience of care and build trust between contraceptive providers and the communities they serve.

Concern that contraception affects future fertility: How common is this concern among young people and does it stop them from using contraception?

ObjectivesThis study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among community college students and its association with contraceptive use. Study designWe used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial with 2060 community college students assigned female at birth. We used mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression adjusted for clustered data to assess sociodemographic factors associated with concerns about contraception affecting future fertility and to test the association between this concern and contraceptive use. ResultsMost participants (69%) worried about contraception affecting their future fertility. Multivariable results indicated that first-generation college students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.55) and non-English speakers at home (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64) were more concerned. Racial and ethnic differences were significant, with Black non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.70–4.70), Asian/Pacific Islander non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.43–3.14), and Hispanic (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17–2.02) participants more likely to be concerned than White non-Hispanic counterparts. Participants who received contraceptive services in the past year had lower odds of this concern (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.88). Furthermore, participants with this concern had lower odds of using contraception (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91), especially hormonal contraception (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.97). ConclusionsMost students feared contraception’s impact on fertility, and this fear was associated with not using contraception. Disparities in this concern may be tied to discrimination, reproductive coercion, and limited reproductive health care access. Addressing concerns about contraception affecting future fertility is crucial to person-centered contraceptive counseling. ImplicationsThis study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among sexually active female community college students and its impact on contraceptive use. Most participants expressed concerns about contraception affecting future fertility. Addressing future fertility concerns in patient-centered contraceptive counseling is crucial for reaching young people.

Provider perspectives on patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latinas in Baltimore, MD

Objectives: To explore: 1) provider narratives of their contraceptive counseling practices with Latina patients within the context of patient-centered care (PCC); and 2) provider perceptions about the barriers to the provision of patient-centered contraceptive counseling in general and more specifically, with Latina patients in Baltimore, MD.Study Design: We conducted 25 semistructured qualitative interviews with physicians and nurse practitioners from four specialties who provide contraceptive care to Latinas in Baltimore, MD. We analyzed data using directed content analysis. We discuss findings with attention to major constructs of PCC, applying a reproductive justice framework.Results: Providers described a contraceptive counseling approach focused on pregnancy prevention as the primary goal. Most respondents used a tiered-effectiveness approach, even while noting the importance of PCC. Providers noted health system barriers to PCC, including time constraints and insurance status. Provider-reported patient-attributed barriers included low patient education/health literacy, culturally-attributed misconceptions about contraception, and language discordance.Conclusion: Providers described knowledge of and intention to practice PCC but had limited integration of it in their own counseling with Latinas. Responses suggest tension between an expressed desire to provide PCC and paternalistic counseling paradigms that prioritize pregnancy prevention over patient preferences. Inequitable health system barriers also interfere with true implementation of contraceptive PCC.Implications: Translating contraceptive PCC into practice, especially for marginalized communities, is paramount. Training should teach clinicians to recognize systems of structural inequity and discrimination that have informed approaches to counseling but are not reflective of PCC. Institutional policies must address health system barriers that also hamper PCC.

Non-barrier contraceptive use patterns among Latina adolescents attending California reproductive health centers: A longitudinal study

ObjectivesTo describe use of non-barrier contraceptives over a 9-month period, consistency in method use, and identify factors associated with method nonuse, switching, and consistency among Latina adolescents attending California sexual and reproductive health (SRH) centers. Study designWe conducted a cohort study using data self-reported at baseline, and 3- and 9-months post-baseline. The analysis included 1162 sexually active adolescents aged 18 to 19 who self-identified as female and Latina, indicated that they were not currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant, and who attended California SRH centers between June 2016 and June 2020. We used binomial generalized multivariable linear models with a log link to assess the likelihood of nonbarrier method consistency, switching, and non-use. ResultsAt baseline, 453 of 1162 (39%) of respondents were using short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, or injection), 113 of 1162 (9.7%) were using long-acting methods (implants or intrauterine devices [IUDs]), and 596 of 1162 (51.3%) reported using neither short- nor long-acting methods. Over a 9-month period, 22/33 (66.7%) of those using IUDs consistently used the method, which was a statistically greater frequency of consistency than individuals who selected other nonbarrier methods (270/530 [50.9%], aRR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.77). Implant users had rates of method consistency similar to users of other nonbarrier methods (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.38). Factors independently associated with method consistency included being older, having never been pregnant, having greater perceived risk of pregnancy, and greater contraceptive knowledge. ConclusionSexually active Latina adolescents attending California SRH centers who were not trying to become pregnant maintained consistent contraceptive use more frequently when using an IUD. Using a patient-centered approach, contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the combined efficacy and contraceptive stability offered by IUDs should patients desire it. ImplicationsThis study addressees gaps in knowledge about U.S. Latina adolescents’ contraceptive use patterns. We demonstrate that IUD users, and not implant users, appear more likely to consistently use their method than those using non-LARC methods. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the greater contraceptive stability that IUDs may offer.

Multilevel Influences on Providers' Delivery of Contraceptive Services: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

Introduction:Access to a full range of contraceptive services is essential for quality health care. Contraceptive provision practices of primary care providers play an important role in patients' decision-making about their reproductive health care. Understanding the multilevel factors influencing contraceptive care delivery in primary care settings is critical for advancing quality care. This study offers an in-depth examination of influences on providers' delivery of contraceptive services across multiple primary care specialties and practice settings to identify issues and strategies to improve care.Materials and Methods:Twenty-four in-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted in 2017 with primary care providers, including family physicians, gynecologists, pediatricians, and nurse practitioners from academic settings, private practices, and health centers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically.Results:Providers described a complex set of influences on their provision of contraception across multiple ecological contexts. Seven major themes emerged from the qualitative analysis, including six types of influence on provision of contraception: organizational, individual provider-related, structural and policy, individual patient-related, community, and the lack of influences or barriers. Providers also discussed the sources they access for information about evidence-based contraception counseling.Conclusions:A diverse set of providers described a complex system in which multiple concentric ecological contexts both positively and negatively influence the ways in which they provide contraceptive services to their patients. To close the gaps in contraceptive service delivery, it is important to recognize that both barriers and facilitators to patient-centered contraceptive counseling exist simultaneously across multiple ecological contexts.

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) as harm reduction: a qualitative study exploring views of women with histories of opioid misuse

BackgroundThe sharp rise in opioid use disorder (OUD) among women coupled with disproportionally high rates of unintended pregnancy have led to a four-fold increase in the number of pregnant women with OUD in the United States over the past decade. Supporting intentional family planning can have multiple health benefits and reduce harms related to OUD but requires a comprehensive understanding of women’s perspectives of preventing unintended pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and experiences as they relate to seeking contraception, particularly LARCs, among women with active or recovered opioid misuse.MethodsIn-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 36 women with current or past opioid misuse were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were coded by ≥ 2 investigators. Themes related to contraceptive care seeking were identified and contextualized within the Health Belief Model.ResultsOur analysis revealed seven interwoven themes that describe individual level factors associated with contraceptive care seeking in women with current or past opioid misuse: relationship with drugs, reproductive experiences and self-perceptions, sexual partner dynamics, access, awareness of options, healthcare attitudes/experiences, and perceptions of contraception efficacy/ side effects. Overall, perceived susceptibility and severity to unintended pregnancy varied, but most women perceived high benefits of contraception, particularly LARC. However, perceived barriers were too high for most to obtain desired contraception to support family planning intentions.ConclusionsThe individual-level factors identified should inform the design of integrated services to promote patient-centered contraceptive counseling as a form of harm reduction. Interventions should reduce barriers to contraceptive access, particularly LARCs, and establish counseling strategies that use open, non-judgmental communication, acknowledge the continuum of reproductive needs, explore perceived susceptibility to pregnancy, and utilize peer educators.

Addressing long-acting reversible contraception access, bias, and coercion: supporting adolescent and young adult reproductive autonomy.

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is comprised of highly effective methods (the subdermal implant and intrauterine devices) available to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Professional medical societies endorse LARC use in AYAs and, more recently, have emphasized the importance of using a reproductive justice framework when providing LARC. This article reviews reproductive justice, discusses contraceptive coercion, examines bias, and highlights interventions that promote equitable reproductive healthcare. Research indicates that both bias and patient characteristics influence provider LARC practices. AYA access to comprehensive LARC services is limited, as counseling, provision, management, and removal are not offered at all sites providing reproductive healthcare to AYAs. Interventions aimed at addressing provider bias and knowledge, clinic policies, confidentiality concerns, insurance reimbursement, and systems of oppression can improve AYA access to equitable, comprehensive contraceptive care. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated inequities in reproductive healthcare, as well as provided unique innovations to decrease barriers, including telemedicine LARC services. Clinicians who care for AYAs should honor reproductive autonomy by approaching contraceptive services with a reproductive justice lens. This includes implementing patient-centered contraceptive counseling, increasing access to LARC, eliminating barriers to LARC removal, and committing to systemic changes to address healthcare inequities.

Provider and Patient Perspectives on a New Tangible Decision Aid Tool to Support Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling with Adolescents and Young Adults.

Despite the benefits of patient-centered contraceptive care, many adolescents and young adults do not receive such care. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate Hello Options, a tangible decision aid to support patient-centered contraceptive counseling with adolescents and young adults in a clinic setting. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hello Options is a contraceptive counseling decision aid tool (hereafter referred to as "the Tool") that allows patients to see and feel life-size "tangible" models of the range of contraceptive methods. The Tool was developed by a team of designers, adolescents, clinicians, and researchers using human-centered design. From December 2019 to March 2020, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the Tool with 10 contraceptive care providers and 40 adolescent and young adult patients (aged 12-29years) at two Chicago clinics. We calculated descriptive statistics for patient survey data, and qualitatively analyzed provider interview transcripts for salient themes using recursive abstraction. Patients had positive reactions to the Tool, reporting that it allowed them to better understand how contraceptive methods work in their body and that it allowed them to make more informed decisions. Furthermore, providers commented that the Tool facilitated conversations with their patients, helped dispel myths about particular methods, and eased patients' anxieties. Limitations mentioned included storage and portability concerns, and time constraints for counseling. Hello Options is a useful, feasible, and acceptable decision aid that can support the provision of patient-centered contraceptive care for young people.

P47 A tangible decision aid to support patient-centered contraceptive counseling among adolescents and young adults

Objectives: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) who experience patient-centered care are more likely to speak with their provider about their contraceptive concerns and select and maintain a contraceptive method – yet most do not receive such care. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the Tangible Tool, a decision aid to support patient-centered contraceptive counseling among AYA.

“It’s a very nuanced discussion with every woman”: Health care providers’ communication practices during contraceptive counseling for patients with substance use disorders

ObjectiveTo explore health care providers’ communication practices during contraceptive counseling for women with substance use disorders (SUDs). Study DesignIn 2019, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with a purposive sample of medical doctors and advanced practice nurses (n = 24). A two-member team analyzed these interviews for themes using deductive and inductive techniques and ATLAS.ti to manage the data. ResultsProviders discussed that developing strong interpersonal relationships and trust is critically important to provide effective contraceptive counseling to women with SUDs. Providers reported exchanging information with patients by asking open-ended questions, tailoring discussions to patients’ responses, and being direct but not judgmental. To facilitate contraceptive decision-making, providers described eliciting patients’ preferences for contraceptive methods while simultaneously using their own clinical judgment and professional experience to identify which methods would be most effective and appropriate for their patients. Most often these were long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, and providers emphasized the benefits of these methods for women with SUDs. ConclusionProviders used a variety of communication strategies, some of which were grounded in the principles of patient-centered care and others that were directive, to discuss contraception with women with SUDs. ImplicationsBecause of past and ongoing stigma and discrimination by health care professionals and the general public, women with SUDs may be distrustful of contraceptive providers. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling may be an effective approach to increase trust and improve relationships and communication between women with SUDs and their providers. Additional research with women with SUDs is needed to understand women’s experiences with and preferences for patient-provider communication during contraceptive counseling.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Attitudes and Acceptability in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Key to Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

To examine the attitudes of adolescent and young adults (AYA) toward long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and to assess how attitudes are associated with acceptability. Survey. Children's Hospital Colorado Adolescent Family Planning Clinic in Aurora, Colorado. Young persons 14-24years of age presenting for any type of visit between March and August2018. A total of 332 participants were enrolled; the majority (62.3%) had high LARC acceptability. We found 5 "attitude" factors: 77.7% of the sample endorsed "Effective" attitudes (eg, wants most effective method), 37.3% endorsed "Good attributes" (eg, discreet, convenient), 23.1% endorsed "Scary" (eg, fears device will move), 16.1% endorsed "Bad for health," (eg, too many side effects), and 9% endorsed "Not for me" (eg, concerns about pain). Although participants who endorsed "Effective" (OR 6.60, 95% CI 3.01-14.49) and "Good attributes" (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.51-6.66) were more likely to have high LARC acceptability than those who endorsed "Scary" (OR 0.28, 95% CI: (0.13-0.61)) and "Not for me" (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.41) factors, approximately 10% of participants with high LARC acceptability endorsed "Scary" or "Bad for health" attitudes, whereas 54% of those with low LARC acceptability endorsed "Effective" attitudes. Although most participants had high LARC acceptability and valued contraceptive effectiveness, the association between LARC attitudes and acceptability is nuanced. Providers should identify and discuss young people's contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Peripartum Contraceptive Care Quality [29I

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes are underutilized in peripartum populations. Little is known about the patient experience of care, and some studies raise concern that care is not always respectful nor patient-centered. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes of peripartum contraceptive care to guide future quality improvement efforts. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey at a tertiary care center in September/October 2018 using two convenience samples: pregnant women (32+ weeks gestation) and postpartum women (4-8 weeks postpartum). We evaluated patient contraceptive care experiences at prenatal visits (pregnant sample) and during childbirth hospitalizations and postpartum visits (postpartum sample). We used the validated, 4-item Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling [PCCC] measure (positive score, all items rated excellent), analyzing data with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We included 117 pregnant patients (response rate 49.5%) and 84 postpartum patients (response rate 43.8%). Participants were largely white (87.1%), aged 25-35 years (66.7%), college graduates (77.6%), and wanting to avoid pregnancy for 2 or more years (63.2%). Positive PCCC scores varied across practice settings (prenatal visit, 66.7%, childbirth hospitalization, 45.2%, postpartum visit, 68.8%). On individual PCCC items, “Excellent” ratings were least common for “my provider gave me enough information to make the best decision about my birth control method” (prenatal visit, 68.9%, childbirth hospitalization, 50.6%, postpartum visit, 69.1%), and “my provider let me say what mattered to me about my birth control method” (prenatal visit, 78.8%, childbirth hospitalization, 63.1%, postpartum visit, 76.3%). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest opportunities to improve patient-centeredness in peripartum contraceptive care, with a goal of providing adequate information and respecting patient preferences and priorities.

Breaking the silence in the primary care office: patients' attitudes toward discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling

ObjectivesAbortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling. Study designIn 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes. ResultsWe achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion. ConclusionsDiscussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma. ImplicationsMentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.